Click on the image to see all the information
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Multiplication Table 62 X 100
EAST ZARAGOZA EXPO THE LEGACY OF
The Court of Auditors has issued a report on the Expo 2008 in Zaragoza. Can be read here some columns Expo 2008 or how joyfully throwing money and Expos, events and other cuts ribbon Trasobares JL and Hall position. Everything in El Periódico de Aragón.
Friday, January 21, 2011
Les Baer Colt 45 For Sale
Immigration Proposal for municipal elections
from Motril, we have sent all our local political parties a document containing the proposals from the association we have to take into account in their manifestos.
think the debate should focus on how to make migration is, for all who reside in Spain, an opportunity for dialogue and building intercultural coexistence, democratic and tolerant with rights and duties for all alike. That is why we emphasize five points which must respond from the parties' electoral programs at the municipal level:
from Motril, we have sent all our local political parties a document containing the proposals from the association we have to take into account in their manifestos.
think the debate should focus on how to make migration is, for all who reside in Spain, an opportunity for dialogue and building intercultural coexistence, democratic and tolerant with rights and duties for all alike. That is why we emphasize five points which must respond from the parties' electoral programs at the municipal level:
1 .- Correcting inequalities labor market.
2 .- Influence regulation Shelter and Custody Immigration of the Port of Motril.
Normalize attention to the immigrant population
4 .- Check funds for integration policies .
5 .- Ensure political rights .
can see the full document by clicking here: proposals for municipal elections
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Simplicity Ellis Crib Side Rails
APUDEPA SPECULATION DISCLAIMS TO THE FOOTBALL FIELD
Other views:
One (expensive) monument to the folly José Luis Trasobares / El Periódico de Aragón 
APUDEPA rejects the use of urban speculation
to build the new football field
Zaragoza City Council has just secured the best assessed by the formula Consistory for the construction of the football in the garden of San Jose is the payment construction companies public land, perhaps the solar Romareda.
The Association of Public Action for Protection of Heritage Aragones APUDEPA , has maintained since its inception that the main reason for deterioration of the city, the quality of life citizens and heritage is the use of urban land speculation, which has created a city to serve the particular enrichment. Therefore APUDEPA seen as a scandal to re-use a formula that was widely reviled by the current Government when the proposed People's Party in 2002. Carried out the operation will be a hit in every rule that only benefit the urban chaos and builders and developers as always, to the detriment of the consolidated city.
APUDEPA asked why the rest of Associations concerned with the development of the city that is displayed along the rejection of land use as currency. This use is that housing has gone up to the absolute limits and which threw the country into a grave crisis of yet there is no clear end. The persistence the commitment to this model of soil and only pitch also shows a disturbing lack of imagination, the political-economic rules, with an acronym or other, only serves itself at the expense of general interest.
Other views:
One (expensive) monument to the folly José Luis Trasobares / El Periódico de Aragón
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Can I Wash Moccasins In The Washing Machine
THE EBRO, AN ABANDONED RIVER WORKS TO REHABILITATE
Spain has been a state of works, abducted by the construction, real estate and civil, with entrenched interests in the heart of government. This has brought us the disastrous consequences that we are suffering, as we are heading for a huge public and private debt, we are not able to honor. Forgetting the classic dichotomy of "guns or butter" have been directed substantial resources provided to produce oversized infrastructure and major projects, if not outright dispensable, whose construction and operating costs make them ruinous. Has benefited them fleetingly, but his hands full, the construction sector. In most cases, these projects have brought a negative environmental impact and irreversible.
Only from this perspective can explain how progress can still be confused with concrete, with asphalt or earth moving. And yet there who understands how to keep a clean river is dredged regularly, the only prevention to be paid if the mayor or the King. Many returns of all kinds, had to give this policy in the past to still try to wind up the same broken toy.
These considerations put the necessary framework to analyze the absurdity of the proposal for a major dredging of the Ebro as "final solution" of the cluster of nonsense that we carry from the annals of Expo2008. The claim that the bed of a living river remains frozen in a snapshot is a vain pretension, unless it is denatured to make it a cemented channel banks.
What sense does it ignore the Ebro River is a gravel and sediment that are fundamental and constitutive element of the river system? The gravel is a natural heritage as valuable as the biological, geomorphological value recognized throughout the international scientific community, which claims the protection of rivers and structure.
constant River dynamics produces morphological changes and induced drag flood fluctuations gravel bars, which are altered and removed during periods of important avenues for further regeneration in the same sedimentary areas, as in this case is the Helios area.
Although part of gravel coming from the peninsula of the bridges, for training were drawn from the river itself, and now they are indistinguishable, so the river should be responsible for naturalize, and already is doing. The disastrous experience of the previous dredging dedicated to force a grotesque navigability of this section in the dry season, alone should carry out more attacks discourage unnecessary and costly river.
blame the Helios bar sediments "generates a loss for the safety of the public when flood" without documenting the types of data or model predictive rests, is an arbitrary assertion, especially when a plastic bed molds itself grown. Something very different is the dam of Vadorrey, which itself is an obstacle in the channel cross-filed and that, paradoxically, the promoters, at the time, assigned no appreciable influence on the risk of flooding. But now state that "these sediments if they were mobilized by a flood could void the functioning and cause significant damage to the dam." That is, which is blamed on the gravel of the risk, not the dam. If protected from the risk of flooding it should remove the dam, which is what could be causing the problem, not gravel.
And as for increased flooding, may be the most significant buildings of the Expo, to restrict groundwater flooding, and even the flag bridge, seated in a large artificial island breakwater, which restricts the drainage capacity, and no one has spoken removing. Ricardo
Aliod . New Water Culture Foundation. Professor of Hydraulics. University of Zaragoza. 
Spain has been a state of works, abducted by the construction, real estate and civil, with entrenched interests in the heart of government. This has brought us the disastrous consequences that we are suffering, as we are heading for a huge public and private debt, we are not able to honor. Forgetting the classic dichotomy of "guns or butter" have been directed substantial resources provided to produce oversized infrastructure and major projects, if not outright dispensable, whose construction and operating costs make them ruinous. Has benefited them fleetingly, but his hands full, the construction sector. In most cases, these projects have brought a negative environmental impact and irreversible.
Only from this perspective can explain how progress can still be confused with concrete, with asphalt or earth moving. And yet there who understands how to keep a clean river is dredged regularly, the only prevention to be paid if the mayor or the King. Many returns of all kinds, had to give this policy in the past to still try to wind up the same broken toy.
These considerations put the necessary framework to analyze the absurdity of the proposal for a major dredging of the Ebro as "final solution" of the cluster of nonsense that we carry from the annals of Expo2008. The claim that the bed of a living river remains frozen in a snapshot is a vain pretension, unless it is denatured to make it a cemented channel banks.
What sense does it ignore the Ebro River is a gravel and sediment that are fundamental and constitutive element of the river system? The gravel is a natural heritage as valuable as the biological, geomorphological value recognized throughout the international scientific community, which claims the protection of rivers and structure.
constant River dynamics produces morphological changes and induced drag flood fluctuations gravel bars, which are altered and removed during periods of important avenues for further regeneration in the same sedimentary areas, as in this case is the Helios area.
Although part of gravel coming from the peninsula of the bridges, for training were drawn from the river itself, and now they are indistinguishable, so the river should be responsible for naturalize, and already is doing. The disastrous experience of the previous dredging dedicated to force a grotesque navigability of this section in the dry season, alone should carry out more attacks discourage unnecessary and costly river.
blame the Helios bar sediments "generates a loss for the safety of the public when flood" without documenting the types of data or model predictive rests, is an arbitrary assertion, especially when a plastic bed molds itself grown. Something very different is the dam of Vadorrey, which itself is an obstacle in the channel cross-filed and that, paradoxically, the promoters, at the time, assigned no appreciable influence on the risk of flooding. But now state that "these sediments if they were mobilized by a flood could void the functioning and cause significant damage to the dam." That is, which is blamed on the gravel of the risk, not the dam. If protected from the risk of flooding it should remove the dam, which is what could be causing the problem, not gravel.
And as for increased flooding, may be the most significant buildings of the Expo, to restrict groundwater flooding, and even the flag bridge, seated in a large artificial island breakwater, which restricts the drainage capacity, and no one has spoken removing. Ricardo
Aliod . New Water Culture Foundation. Professor of Hydraulics. University of Zaragoza.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)